
RAG retrieves knowledge in real time. Fine-tuning bakes knowledge into the model. Learn when to use each, and why most production systems use both.

Vector search returns the top-K nearest neighbors. Re-ranking uses a smarter model to order them by true relevance. It boosts RAG accuracy by 10-15%.

Complex questions need multi-step answers. Query decomposition breaks a hard question into sub-questions, retrieves for each, and synthesizes the final answer.

Semantic search understands meaning. Keyword search matches exact terms. Learn when to use each, how hybrid search combines them, and which is better for RAG.

Adaptive RAG routes queries to different retrieval strategies based on complexity. Simple questions use fast retrieval. Complex questions use multi-step retrieval.

Corrective RAG detects low-quality retrieval and automatically retries with refined queries. Build a self-healing RAG pipeline with retrieval evaluation and fallback search.

Self-RAG lets the LLM decide when to retrieve, what to retrieve, and whether the retrieved content is sufficient. It improves accuracy by 15-25% over standard RAG.

Chunking is the most underrated step in RAG. Learn fixed-size, semantic, and recursive chunking with Python code examples using LangChain and LlamaIndex.

The best chunk size for RAG is 300-500 tokens. Too small loses context. Too large dilutes relevance. Learn how to optimize chunk size for your embedding model and use case.

Source attribution is trust. Link every claim to a real URL. Learn three patterns for RAG source tracking: inline citations, footnotes, and structured JSON.

Reranking uses a cross-encoder to reorder initial retrieval results. It improves RAG accuracy by 10-20% but adds 50-200ms latency. Here is when to use it.

Three methods to combine vector and keyword search: RRF fusion, weighted scoring, and two-stage retrieval. Implementation guide with Python code.

Hybrid search combines vector similarity and keyword matching. For RAG, this means 15-30% better retrieval accuracy when queries mix concepts with specific terms.

RAGAS is the standard framework for evaluating RAG pipelines without ground-truth data. Learn the four core metrics and how to implement them in Python.

RAG pipeline evaluation requires more than "it looks right." Use RAGAS, custom metrics, and human evaluation to measure retrieval accuracy and generation quality.

A decision framework for choosing a vector database: managed vs self-hosted, latency, hybrid search, and cost at scale.

OpenAI, Cohere, and open-source embedding models compared for RAG. The best model depends on your budget, language needs, and latency requirements.

RAG pipelines are expensive because they require separate scraping, cleaning, chunking, and embedding services. Keiro collapses three of those into one API call.

Web search retrieves live internet content. Vector search retrieves from a static knowledge base. Here is when to use each — and how to combine them.

An AI search API delivers clean, structured web content designed for LLM consumption. Here is what it is, how it works, and why every AI app needs one.

LLMs have training cutoffs. Here is how to ground them in real-time web data using Keiro search and content extraction in under 50 lines of code.

Choosing the right search API depends on latency needs, budget, content extraction requirements, and RAG integration. Here is a decision framework.

Integrate web search into LangChain agents using Keiro. Python and JavaScript code examples for real-time grounding.

Keiro is the best search API for RAG applications — built-in content extraction, pre-chunked output, sub-300ms latency, and the lowest price on the market.

A step-by-step guide to building a RAG pipeline that searches the web, extracts content, and generates answers — all with Keiro and LangChain.
Join thousands of developers using Keiro to power their AI applications — 10× cheaper than the alternatives with superior performance.
Start free trial